Economic aftermath

Researcher responds to Humane Society International – International Fund for Animal Welfare report on polar bear trade.

The HSI-IFAW authors are correct that Inuit receive barely one-half of sport hunt fees, citing my figure of $1.5-million as this annual revenue, but then question the importance of sport hunt money to Inuit.

I derived the economic effect from the value of the traditional food produced for each sport-hunt dollar Inuit “invested” in hunting equipment. The result was a 5:1 return.

Polar bear sport-hunting, as an economic activity, took off in the aftermath of the collapse of the world sealskin market, an occurrence in which the International Fund for Animal Welfare played a primary role.

Advertisements

0 Responses to “”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




@AIC

REVIEW

Yann Martel's Beatrice & Virgil

INTERVIEW

Trevor Herriot

INTERVIEW

Erika Ritter

VIDEO

Toronto's cat problem

INTERVIEW

Don LePan

REVIEW

Don LePan's Animals

REVIEW

Justine Pimlott's Cat City

REVIEW

Erika Ritter's The Dog by the Cradle, the Serpent Beneath


%d bloggers like this: